<br>Hello Fernando,<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">>>We've obviously let 2.4-isms creep in. Is upgrading to 2.4 not<br>
>>easy/feasible for you? </blockquote><div>We have a large code base which needs to be migrated, and we will probably go to 2.5, we just dont have the<br>manpower to do it now. Ipython isn't critical where I work, I'm the only one using it. I will run it in a VM where I already have 2.5 installed, but this will be just for learning, not everyday use.<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">>>now that actually *needs* 2.4, this was purely accidental (and trivial</blockquote>
<div>It might be good to indicate on the Windows installer filename, that 2.4+ is required (aor at least in a readme file), as well as having Ipython detect the appropriate version instead of an unhandled exception occurring. <br>
<br>Although, I would suspect there are probably not many people out there using 2.3 these days ;-)<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
>>to fix, btw, since sets were already a module in 2.3). It's just that</blockquote><div>The syntax is slightly different in 2.3<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>>>But certainly if there's a genuine need for 2.3 still out there, we<br>
>>can try to accomodate. Voices?</blockquote><div>I wouldn't say my need is critical, as I am still learning IPython. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<font color="#888888">Thanks for the info!</font></blockquote><div><br><br> </div></div>